In my April 2020 Custom Soft Corner column, I reviewed the clinical case of two sisters who were on the hunt for comfortable daily disposable lenses that provided stable and clear vision. Table 1 provides a summary of their updated ocular measurements.
CASE 1 (16 years old) | CASE 2 (19 years old) | |
Spectacle Refraction | OD: –5.00 –1.00 x 170 OS: –5.00 –1.00 x 165 |
OD: –4.50 –1.50 x 175 OS: –4.50 –1.50 x 005 |
Flat K/steep K (D) | OD: 44.31/46.00 @ 090 OS: 44.13/46.10 @ 067 |
OD: 44.98/46.60 @ 100 OS: 45.27/46.46 @ 080 |
Diagonal Visible Iris Diameter (mm) | OD: 12.37 OS: 12.43 |
OD: 11.97 OS: 11.94 |
Horizontal Visible Iris Diameter (mm) | OD: 12.4 OS: 12.5 |
OD: 12.0 OS: 12.1 |
A dollar store ruler is really all that you need to gauge how successful each of these patients will be in a mass-produced soft lens. We know that the larger the cornea, the deeper or greater the sagittal height of the eye. The daily disposables trialed on each sister all decentered and resulted in increased lens awareness, especially after a few hours of wear, and in unstable vision. Each sister was fit in empirically ordered hybrid contact lenses by supplying the manufacturing lab with spectacle Rx, Ks, and horizontal visible iris diameter (HVID) (Figure 1).
Notable Improvements
During the dispense visit, each sister reported excellent quality of vision that was far superior to that with any of the soft toric daily disposables that they had previously trialed. The lenses settled on-eye for at least five minutes and then were evaluated. Ideal movement of the soft skirt is similar in primary gaze and upgaze to that of a soft lens (video available below). The 8.5mm GP diameter matches the optic zone diameter in newer-generation hybrid lenses, theoretically giving wearers an optimal visual experience regardless of pupil size. The tear lens under the GP center adds to the high quality and quantity of vision. There was full corneal coverage, with only slight decentration of each 14.5mm diameter lens on-eye (Figure 2).
One Week Later
One week after successful dispense of their hybrid lenses, the sisters returned for a follow-up visit. Wear time was eight-to-10 hours every day for the 16-year-old, while the 19-year-old struggled with application and felt that the lenses blurred her peripheral vision. The 16-year-old was happy with the comfort and level of vision with the lenses. Slit lamp examination revealed a decrease in lens movement on both eyes for each sister, with no signs of corneal compromise upon removal.
Next Steps
Should modifications to the hybrid lens linear skirt be incorporated? I will discuss my clinical approach in my October 2021 column. CLS