Clinical Scorecard: Scleral Trends: Mini-Scleral Designs and Toric Landing Zones
At a Glance
| Category | Detail |
|---|---|
| Condition | Scleral lens fitting |
| Key Mechanisms | Transition from large-diameter to mini-scleral lens designs; use of toric landing zones reflecting anatomical scleral shape. |
| Target Population | Patients requiring scleral lenses, particularly those with keratoconus and other corneal irregularities. |
| Care Setting | High-volume specialty contact lens clinics. |
Key Highlights
- 60.8% of scleral lenses prescribed were mini-scleral designs.
- Use of mini-scleral lenses increased from 44% in 2016 to 74% in 2022.
- 99.8% of scleral lens fittings utilized toric landing zones.
- Mean number of lenses required for successful fitting was 1.4 ± 0.7.
- The introduction of bi-tangential mini-scleral lenses in 2018 improved fitting outcomes.
Guideline-Based Recommendations
Diagnosis
- Utilize diagnostic fitting sets for accurate scleral lens fitting.
Management
- Consider mini-scleral designs for most patients, except those who have undergone keratoplasty.
Monitoring & Follow-up
- Track fitting success rates and lens re-orders to optimize patient outcomes.
Risks
- Inadequate fitting may lead to discomfort or complications; ensure toric landing zones are used.
Patient & Prescribing Data
6,635 unique patients, median age 43 years.
Younger patients with keratoconus had a median age of 35 years; mini-scleral lenses are preferred for most indications.
Clinical Best Practices
- Employ the Visser fitting philosophy for scleral lens fittings.
- Monitor the anatomical scleral shape to determine the need for toric landing zones.
- Leverage practitioner experience to reduce the number of lenses needed for successful fittings.
References
- Scleral lens prescribing trends study
- Qualitative assessment of scleral shape patterns
- Clinical performance of a new bitangential mini-scleral lens
- Practitioner learning curve in fitting scleral lenses
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.


